\nI was in the room when Terrifier 2<\/em> was being watched on TV. My back was to it, but I could hear it well enough follow along, more or less. It was graphic and gross, but not really scary, I thought. I’ve heard movies that were much harder to listen to.<\/p>\n \nWhat amazes me is that, even in 2022, the same types of follies seem to ensnare the characters as back in the 70s. Terrifier 2<\/em> references one or more of those classic horror films with varying subtlety. It has a rampage-style plot, with gory attacks on unsuspecting characters, etc. From what I could tell, it’s the movie’s particular type of gory action that seems to sell it, plus the dubious personality of the clown (Art?).<\/p>\n \nSell, it indeed does. Terrifier 2<\/em>, from a budget of $250,000, had made more than three times that within a few days of its release. It would go on to make more than 30 times its budget within a month.<\/p>\n I guess some things never get old, eh?<\/p>\n cinemablend.com<\/a><\/p>\nJack of Oracle Tutoring by Jack and Diane,<\/a> Campbell River, BC. \n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Self-tutoring about pop culture: the tutor mentions a curiosity. I was in the room when Terrifier 2 was being watched on TV. My back was to it, but I could hear it well enough follow along, more or less. It …<\/p>\n